This victim mentality won’t take you anywhere and you’ll never make it in life with this thinking. Man up and make a coherent argument. No one will give you the sympathy you are seeking when you keep playing victim.

This seems reasonable, but then at what point do we say “no” to making dedicated spaces because someone thought their rights are being infringed?

Separate spaces for smoking are common. What about dedicated spaces where street music performers can perform and others where they can’t?

What if someone doesn’t want to see tattoos? At what point do you say “your annoyance is unreasonable”? I mean surely this one is, but is there a guideline that separates this from playing loud music?

A extreme case would be someone who wishes to make a space free of a certain race. Obviously this is ridiculous and bad, but I am seeking a guideline that can separate these unreasonable ones from the reasonable ones.

If you can’t handle disagreement you don’t belong here. I’m the only one who was willing to give you benefit of the doubt, no one else had given you their time of day. So delete your post if you can’t handle disagreement.

Why did you say you won’t argue then proceed to ask questions? Make up your mind.

Who said that? Form coalitions with whom?

If you mean “those opposing genocide in Palestine refuse to form a coalition with supporters do genocide” then I don’t see the issue.

You cannot call that “concede political power” when they never had it in the first place. If they did, they’d stop the genocide.

But some of these “rights” do contradict each other.

For example, it may be reasonable to say “I want the freedom to walk through my city downtown without having to smell strong weed”, but at the same time it is just as reasonable to say “I want the freedom to smoke weed in my city downtown”. Those two rights conflict. They limit each other. You can’t have both without restrictions. Which one would you have?

Smoking weed is just an example. You can replace it with “dressing provocatively” or even “dressing entirely naked” or it could be “playing loud unpleasant music in a popular street”.

Each of those “restrict the right of others” but so does the reverse. Which right or freedom are we picking?

Not sure I understand your question. Down votes seem to indicate others are the same. What do you mean by “concede all political power” and who suggested that?

Who split?

Is this an alternative to bitwarden and keepass? Is it better in terms of security?

For the mid Atlantic area there’s “hiking upward”, it’s pretty awesome.

That’s actually what I use as well currently. It doesn’t replace all trails completely but it’s something

Can you clarify what you mean by Chromecast support? I have a Chromecast device and it has the jellyfin app on it. Works like a charm without issues. I have a feeling you mean something else though?

He most likely isn’t the one who did it. The eyebrows from his suspect photo are way off.

They likely wanted to charge someone so the public doesn’t get ideas about doing a similar thing and not getting caught.

I agree, but we don’t have to convince anyone. A large minority would still be a huge achievement. In fact we don’t even need more than that.

Depending on your distro, that command likely has a GUI alternative. It just depends on the distro implementation, the disparity is a weakness of GUIs in general. instructions for windows won’t match MacOS or others, and sometimes even older versions of windows

They don’t know ring 0, but they would understand “this anti cheat is the most privacy invasive kind, controlling and monitoring everything on your computer”.

Try other games? Whatever kind of game you like, there’s likely a less invasive alternative. We’re no longer in the era of game scarcity.

I agree with your first paragraph, if you just got hooked to these games and want to compromise your own privacy and security by playing these games, that is your own trade offs.

But your second paragraph claims that not compromising security and privacy means you have to deal with cheaters. That is false. The games who support Linux do not have more cheaters. In fact, there’s plenty of cheaters all over the anti Linux games, such as destiny and league.

Also there are plenty of multi-player and competitive games on Linux. It’s only a few who do not (who admittedly also happen to be some of the more popular titles). I only agree with this sentiment if you’re hooked onto the specific games that are anti Linux, not the competitive multi-player genre.

Anyone looking for the best package manager needs to look only at portage/emerge and nix

But mullvad stopped allowing port forwarding. Is there an exception for tailscale??

How does this work??? I thought I wouldn’t be able to use Mullvad with port forwarding. Would I need to have a vps? Would the VPS not disallow me for connecting to VPN or detecting p2p traffic?